Mark Dow

Geek art

Oak cubes and hexagonal tilings

    Various images all volume rendered from a single cropped chunk of DigiMorph CT data of Quercus robur (English or Peduncate Oak): Dr. Peter Gasson, 2002, "Quercus robur" (On-line), Digital Morphology. Accessed October 23, 2006 at http://digimorph.org/specimens/Quercus_robur/. The individal renderings were made using Space Software. Volume data for the cube (in Space Software's native volume format): Oak_cube.vol.gz (8 MB).

48-Meta-Cube, link to  Fractal hexexagonal cube tilings, link to

Ambiguous Triple Cubes
48 Meta-Cube
16 Rotation Ambiguous Cubes
Fractal hexagonal tilings of cubes

Ambiguous Triple Cubes

Ambiguous Triple Cube animation
3 segment rocking animation. (Best if viewed as a continuous loop/repeat.)
Ambiguous_Triple_Cube_small.avi  3.4 MB, 423 x 456 px. 
Ambiguous_Triple_Cube.avi  12 MB, high resolution version: 846 x 912 px.
Ambiguous Triple Cube animation
8 segment rotation animation, cropped. (Best if viewed as a continuous loop/repeat.)
Ambiguous_Triple_Cube_x2rHc320.wmv  2 MB, 320 x 240 px., 32 s
Ambiguous_Triple_Cube_x2rHc640.wmv  8 MB, high resolution version: 640 x 480 px., 32 s
Ambiguous Triple Cube
Ambiguous_Triple_Cube.jpg (still image)





    Motion resolves the depth ambiguities, but there are depth discontinuities at motion transitions. The discontinuities aren't apparent until sometime after the transitions, so the percept is smooth. This visual illusion is derived from Oscar Reutersvärd's "Impossible Triangle", which was popularized in the 1950's by Roger Penrose, and is sometimes called a "Penrose Triangle".  
    My percept of the "rocking" version is different than the "rotating" version: in the rotating version I often percieve the cubes to apparently slide to their new configuration.

48 Meta-Cube

    This figure is composed of all rotations (3x8 corners), including mirroring (x2), of the same cube. In this sense it is a representation of the rotation group: in mechanics and geometry, the rotation group is the group of all rotations about the origin of 3-dimensional Euclidean space R3 under the operation of composition.
48 Meta-cube
48_Meta-Cube_o4.jpg  (small)
48_Meta-Cube.jpg  (large, 4 MB, 4900x4900 px.)

"The group itself is never given as a physical object -- we can imagine a rigid body as a sensory datum, but the set of al rotations of it is an idea located on a higher level of abstraction." Yuri I. Manin, in "Mathematics and Physics" (translation of "Matematika i fizika", Birkhauser, Boston 1981)

I don't subscribe to this view; here I have given the group as a physical object -- a sensory datum.

16 Rotation Ambiguous Cubes

16 Rotation abmbiguous cubes
16_Rotation_Ambiguous_Cubes_xp4.jpg  (medium)
16_Rotation_Ambiguous_Cubes_o10.jpg  (small)
16_Rotation_Ambiguous_Cubes.jpg  (large)

    A couple people have asked to use this image, and I am fond of it too. Kristel Braunius, a Graphic Designer in Holland, asked to use it in "a little book about 'clean language / communication' for the university of Wageningen in Holland." She sent the page proof (below), which is a nice juxtaposition of the image with a diagram of the human visual system. I wonder what the Dutch chapter title "Over de taal" means:

Kristel_Braunius page design, link to


Fractal hexagonal tilings of cubes

1 Cube, fractal hexagonal tiling
1_Cube_fractal_hex_tile_1st.jpg







16 Cubes, fractal hexagonal tiling
12_Cubes_fractal_hex_tile_2nd_o4.jpg
12_Cubes_fractal_hex_tile_2nd.jpg
2500x2400 px.





144 Cubes, fractal hexagonal tiling
144_Cubes_fractal_hex_tile_3rd_o16.jpg
144_Cubes_fractal_hex_tile_3rd_o4.jpg
2000x2100 px.
144_Cubes_fractal_hex_tile_4th.jpg
12 MB, 8000x8700 px.
This figure is composed of all rotations (3x8 corners), including mirroring (x2) and rotated shadowings (x3), of the same cube.
1728 Cubes, fractal hexagonal tiling



------------------------------------
There are no restrictions on use of the images and animations on this page. Claiming to be the originator of the material, explicitly or implicitly, is bad
karma. A link (if appropriate), a note to dow[at]uoregon.edu, and credit are appreciated but not required.

Comments are welcome (dow[at]uoregon.edu).